In a sweeping opinion handed down in late July, United States District Judge James Peterson struck a substantial number of voting provisions from the books in Wisconsin. The opinion, which spans 119 pages, found that multiple voter restrictions enacted by the state legislature were motivated by a desire to advantage incumbent and aspiring Republican officials. The court first rejected the plaintiffs’ facial challenge, relying on a 7th Circuit decision which held that even if some voters have trouble complying with the law, and those voters tend to be racial minorities, the law is not necessarily facially unconstitutional. This initial victory in preserving the overall voter ID law marks the extent of the defendants’ success in the case.
View Posts by State
Tags2016 Election Absentee Ballot Access ballot initiative Battleground 2012 California Campaign Finance Citizens United Colorado Democrats Disenfranchise Election 2016 election law Electronic Voting Felon Voting Rights First Amendment Fourteenth Amendment Gerrymandering in-depth article judicial elections National Voter Registration Act photo ID primary election Recount Redistricting Referendum Registration Republicans Secretary of State Supreme Court Symposium Texas Virginia Vote by mail Voter Fraud Voter ID Voter Identification voter registration voting Voting Machines Voting Rights Voting Rights Act VRA William & Mary Write in